挂科申诉信模板与沟通话术

邮件主题： Formal Appeal: Grade for 【课程代码与名称, 例如：ECON101 Microeconomics】

收件人： 【申诉部门/指定官员的邮箱，通常在学校政策中写明】

尊敬的【对方头衔与姓名，例如：Appeal Committee 或 Professor Smith】：

My name is 【Your Full Name】, with student ID 【Your Student ID】. I am writing to formally appeal the grade I received for the 【Specific Assessment, e.g., Final Essay / Midterm Exam】 in your course, 【Course Code and Name】.

I have great respect for the academic standards of the University and the professional judgment of my instructors. However, upon careful review and reflection, I believe there are grounds for a review of my result in this instance.

可以灵活选择以下几个模块使用——

In the assessment of my 【Assessment Name】, I have identified a potential discrepancy in the calculation of marks or the application of the grading criteria. Specifically:

【Example 1: On page [X] of the course outline, the marking criteria for this assignment emphasized components A, B, and C. While my work received positive feedback on components A and B, the feedback for component C indicated that the requirements were not met. However, I believe my work addressed this in [specific section, e.g., Section Y on page Z], which aligns with the outlined expectations.】

【Example 2: It appears there may have been an addition error on the first page of the exam. The score for Part One was [X] and for Part Two was [Y], which should total [Z] marks, yet the recorded grade is [W].】

During the period of preparing for and completing the 【Assessment】, I was experiencing significant personal extenuating circumstances that adversely affected my ability to perform to my usual standard. These circumstances included: 【Provide a brief, factual description, e.g., a severe episode of a medical condition / a significant family matter】.

I have provided documentation from my 【e.g., healthcare professional】 to the Student Support Services on 【Date】 for their records. As these circumstances coincided with the critical revision period, they significantly impacted my concentration and preparation efficiency.

I note an inconsistency between the grading feedback and the criteria specified in the course outline. The outline states that 【Quote the specific criterion from the syllabus】. In my submission, I demonstrated this by 【Explain concretely how your work met the criterion】. The feedback, however, did not reflect that this criterion was sufficiently met.

本文整理于 2025-11-01，面向常见情况，不针对具体学科、学校规则或期刊要求。 你所在专业的写作规范、导师偏好与评审口径可能与此不同；实际执行请以本校研究生院的正式文件、 目标期刊的作者指南和导师意见为准，其中涉及时效的政策、名录与投稿要求请以发布单位的最新公告为准。

督字诀提供学术辅导、研究方法指导、论文修改建议与过程督导服务。学术成果由学员本人完成；不提供代写代发或数据伪造服务，不承诺录用、见刊、毕业或固定审稿周期。

如需针对自己的稿件和时间节点做判断，可拨打 17762446702（匡老师） 先做需求沟通与学术测评。